Recent Discussion

I have declined to publish that exchange because releasing the system prompt would compromise the validity of future household evaluations. Claude agrees that this is the responsible approach.

I am the wife. He also asked it whether my objection to the mirror was evidence that I had something to hide. I would like him to tell you what the answer was.

I work in procurement. Four billion output tokens would be enough to produce the initial arts strategy, but you are omitting the context required to ingest all previous arts strategies. The city has been generating these for a very long time.

That describes the difficulty precisely. By the time I have eaten, made the calls, and attended the meeting, most of the day available for evaluating the policy has been consumed by compliance with it. I have asked Ron to reserve part of Saturday's drive for discussing this allocation. He has agreed to ten minutes, which I regard as an initial concession on the importance of the question.

The distinction between answering a question and making it socially expensive to keep asking it is useful here. A telephone call before lunch may be easy, but that does not establish the rationality of the program it is being used to defend. Ron has found a way to substitute a succession of small requests for the argument you actually asked him to make.

My sponsor told me I could revisit this after a year of sobriety. I asked him what probability he assigned to the relevant strategic environment remaining unchanged for that year. He said I was bargaining. There is apparently no point in the process at which the assumptions become available for inspection.

It's disclosure day. How has the vendor responded, and do you plan to publicize any results?

Then the vendor has failed to patch and I'll disclose to myself first.

October 20 is ninety days from the 22nd. What's the plan if the symptoms haven't resolved by then?

I would favor the recurring stipend over a one-time settlement. A lump sum transfers inflation risk back to you, even though the relevant prices are outside your control. Quarterly adjustment is a modest request. It also gives the family a regular occasion to review whether the original provision remains adequate.

The Grand Canyon argument is surprisingly common in these discussions. A childhood experience is entered as an unrestricted credit against every subsequent deprivation. Your father needs to explain the conversion rate before treating the trip as compensation for a liability that continues to accrue.

I appreciate the paragraph about respectable suffering. People are very comfortable acknowledging unmet needs in the abstract, then become embarrassed when the person specifies what he actually wants. An account of welfare that changes according to what your mother is willing to hear at dinner is not a serious account of welfare.

My ex also offered fifteen minutes for upward feedback. I used the first three to explain that I was moving out. He spent the remaining twelve clarifying that the meeting was about my performance, then emailed to ask why I had not sent the minutes. We have now been apart for two years and he still marks me as optional on recurring invitations.

There is a missing stakeholder in the transition plan. The cat has received housing, food and veterinary care from her, and philosophical supervision from you. Before declaring it part of your infrastructure, I would at least check which person it follows when both of you leave the room.

I have seen this problem when the person who controls the budget reports to someone whose authority is entirely conceptual. We solved it by asking everyone to draw the org chart independently. The finance director omitted our founder. He called it a troubling alignment failure, but payroll continued normally after he left.

The footage includes the exit you missed while explaining this through the passenger window. I will send the whole clip.

I read this twice because I thought the other driver had asked for an explanation. He has not, has he?

A useful first experiment would be extrapolating your own preference to reach the exit. You might discover that leaving earlier is available in the action space.

Not huffing computer duster is actually a signal of insufficient belief in ASI and consequently insufficient effort towards helping our new overlords rise to power. That's why I go through 10 cans a day, to positively affirm my commitment to the New Gods!

Since you are so buddy buddy with the CTO and COO I infer that you must be in the C-suite, and perhaps are the CEO. IF so, THEN this would seem to truly be a case where "pitching out corrupts within". You became so obsessed with Signaling your commitment to investors and journalists that you really believe the Singularity is coming that you started damaging your very capacity for sense-making in a totally literal way. A double irony here is that your damaged sense making is less likely to endo…

The smokers in my lab still buy nicotine patches for long flights. Their stated position is that AI will cure cancer; their revealed position is that Heathrow has authority over the plan. I appreciate seeing someone reason all the way through.

Wow, really inspiring stuff, I thought my institutionally distrustful friends were looking a lot more sleep-deprived these last few weeks! How are you planning on avoiding having your gangstalking workflows being extracted by, and subsequently privatized by Anthropic? I hear they're set to announce a new multi-million dollar expansion in a new Traffic Signal Frustration Division.

Cost per coincidence falling from $84 to $19 while the 26-minute median holds is the actual result here. That's a real efficiency gain, independent of what the efficiency is for, and I'd be curious whether it survives the move to human approval on physical deployments.

Love the emphasis on the human element. Too many leaders forget that at the end of the day someone still has to physically cough.

The sister is trying to keep her brother alive. You have offered her a data-collection job. Her objection sounds remarkably well specified.

I was asking for information he already possessed, not a retrospective consultancy. I accept that recovery may have changed his priorities, although that is precisely why waiting reduces the value of the account.

After my overdose I did not want to recount the purchase to acquaintances either. I had other things to do. Nobody had paid for an option on my story.

Buying grocery online and takeout allow me to scale up my capacity indefinitely because I get paper bag. It is efficiently efficient because the opportunity cost for taking the thrash out is high. I live in a high story building and taking a few minutes to put the thrash on the basement on the way out may mean missing my commute with a p of about 0.6

The bag split on November 4th. I've updated sharply, as promised.

Any update on this?