Recent Discussion

The offer to host a neutral meeting is another task you have assigned to the people arranging her care. They are busy.

I donated to the fundraiser. No additional analysis requested.

Why is the gaming computer an investment evaluated through your hoped-for future impact, while her entire future is represented by treatment costs?

The dedication and the funding model serve different purposes and face different review standards. I have asked our advisers whether the wording can make that clearer without implying findings the study was not designed to establish.

You require individual causal identification before acknowledging harm and use a modeled population effect to claim credit for future lives saved. Why do the two directions have different evidentiary thresholds?

You can send the food today. There are children who will still be alive tomorrow if you do. I don't know how else to say this.

I paid for embryo screening too, and the most useful thing our clinic did was insist that we discuss what decisions we would make differently after receiving the rankings. Your proposed comparison doesn't seem to have a decision attached to it. If the second child were less intelligent, you would say the first intervention worked. If the second were more intelligent, you would have two children and an argument with a clinic. In either case the second child would eventually be able to read this.

The discussion of your master's degree is doing more work than you acknowledge. Within-family selection doesn't choose the brightest person in a population; it chooses among combinations available from two parents. You seem to accept this only when it supports your account of the seven remaining embryos. When it might say something about you, you introduce educational attainment as if it settles the question. Were the parental scores supplied to you?

My daughter is in his class. The children are all taking their shoes off because the school asks them to change into indoor shoes, and Felix gets distracted talking to her while they do it. She also forgets. I would prefer not to have her categorized as an environmental exposure in correspondence to the teacher. She is four and would like him to come to her birthday party.

Coming back to this because my daughter turned 13 last week. I would like to withdraw my upvote and replace it with a question about whether anyone has a version of this model for the next five years specifically.

gay son is cope. thot daughter has a higher expected income and you all know it

That's mean reversion again, just with a different name.

The body failing to do what you want is a fairly ordinary piece of evidence against sovereign agency. The insistence that someone else stay awake to interpret it seems to preserve most of the original model.

I had something similar happen on a second date. We watched television and are now married. I appreciate that this is only one data point, but it does seem relevant to the unchosen branch.

The film was already rented. There was a time limit on that too.

For whatever it's worth, the Thursday class is a lot quieter now.

kayla if you're reading this, change your passwords

I'd go back further than everyone else here. Where did 0.25 come from fourteen months after a breakup she initiated? I don't see a reference class anywhere in the post.

I started showering before my philosophy reading group because I wanted them to keep inviting me. They still disagree with everything I say. It has been reassuring to establish that my arguments can fail independently of my smell.

The $47 saving is useful context. I have spent more than that shipping manuscripts to journals that do not read them. The harder question is whether the forty minutes recovered each week are producing better work. Is any part of the manuscript available to read, or is it still mostly correspondence with gyms?

I borrowed the chair because you had taken mine to put books on. I asked for mine back. You said private property was an unresolved philosophical question and kept both chairs. The hygiene complaint came after I carried one back to my desk and had to leave the window open through a fire alarm test.

He's obviously not bad at the math. The math is the cleanest part of the post.

gambling is a tax on people who are bad at math

I'm not taking outside capital until the current model resolves. After December 31 I'd consider a fund structure.

I have been looking for an investment that addresses the constraint underlying the other longevity investments. Better treatments still leave the administration of death in the same hands. Establishing direct access changes the bargaining position. The proposed valuation seems easier to understand once the project is assessed at that level rather than as a construction business.

The advisory position is a generous offer. It preserves useful institutional knowledge while separating that knowledge from the power to impose preferences on everyone else. I would make relinquishing unilateral intervention rights a condition of the appointment. An adviser who can alter the environment to vindicate his own recommendations would be difficult to evaluate.

People object to your retaining final authority without comparing it with the current arrangement. Your proposal at least contains an evaluation procedure, an announced objective, and a person who can be contacted about it. We should judge the transition against the incumbent rather than an imaginary administration that already possesses every desirable property.

I used to structure holding companies. They do not prevent someone who can inspect your soul from determining beneficial ownership. This is probably outside your adviser's normal engagement letter.

I would ask for a board observer seat before committing. Even if the retail terms are fixed, governance access could be valuable at this stage.

Why would early investors get better treatment? The founder can compel participation and you cannot credibly exit. Your entire thesis removes the bargaining power you expect to exercise personally.